Put cost in the workflow, before the change ships.
Infrastructure, code, and AI changes flagged in the pull request. Velocity stays. Governance catches up.
Tests gate the merge. Cost doesn't.
You already gate code on tests and static analysis. Cost is the one thing that ships unreviewed and shows up weeks later on a bill nobody connects back to that pull request.
By then the expensive change is in production and the fix means rework. Torb puts the cost estimate in the pull request, where the person who wrote the change can still cheaply change it.
What ships unreviewed costs you.
- Cost regressions noticed at the bill, not at review.
- Always-on and oversized resources shipping without a second look.
- Cost decisions with no clear owner, settled by month-end finger-pointing.
- Rework, because issues get fixed in production instead of once, at the cheapest point.
What platform teams ship with CloudVerse.
PR cost diff
Every infra PR gets an inline cost impact estimate before reviewers see it. Advisory or required, your choice. The governance happens where the work happens.
Policy-as-code
Cost guardrails versioned in your repo. Advisory mode posts an estimate. Required mode blocks PRs above your defined cost threshold until explicitly approved. Both modes are code, not configuration buried in a third-party portal.
Native CI integration
GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, Argo. No new pipeline. Torb slots into what your teams already use.
Multi-IaC support
Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Helm, Kubernetes. Seven-plus formats. One integration.
How Torb controls
every infra change.
Read the docsTorb sits in your CI pipeline. On each infra change it estimates the cost delta against your team's policy and posts it inline, with a fallback and a decision log.
A linter runs the rule you wrote. Torb works out whether that rule is still right.
Trigger when a new deal record is created.
Enrich the record with web research.
Score the lead and route to the right AE.
Route lead to Enterprise and draft outreach.
Route lead to SMB and draft outreach.
Most teams recover the cost from a single prevented regression.
In a typical pre-production review, Torb flags around $2,400 of monthly spend before it ships. One catch pays for the tool. The figure below is illustrative of a single review.
Outcomes your team feels.
- Cost. expensive changes caught before they ship, prevented at source.
- Risk. fewer surprise bills and regressions reaching production.
- Control. ownership on the people making the decision.
- Productivity. less firefighting, issues fixed once at the cheapest point.
- Velocity. guardrails that keep delivery moving, not blocking it.
- Visibility. financial impact inside the workflow, not buried in a bill.
The people who ship the change.
Cost sits next to tests and static analysis, one more gate the team already trusts.
Expensive changes get caught in review, not three weeks later on the invoice.
Policy as code, versioned in the repo, with no separate portal to keep in sync.
PR-level cost diffs mean fewer surprise regressions to firefight after the fact.
Platform engineering questions, answered.
What platform and DevOps leads ask first.