CloudVerse Torv

Catch cost regressions before they reach production.

Cost context lands in the pull request, for infrastructure, application code, and AI calls. Velocity stays high. Governance finally keeps up.

Book a Demo See a real PR example

Infrastructure cost mistakes don't look like mistakes.

A change ships. It passes review, it passes tests, it looks fine. The cost shows up weeks later on a bill nobody connects back to that pull request. By then the fix means unwinding work already in production.The cheapest moment to catch a regression is before it merges, in front of the person who wrote it.

Before Torv

Cost found after merge

SignalDiscovered on next month's bill
TimingWeeks after it merged
OwnerNobody links it back
FixUnwind work in production
PolicyTribal knowledge

With Torv

Cost seen in the PR

SignalCommented inline on the PR
TimingBefore review, before merge
OwnerIn front of who wrote it
FixChange a line before it ships
PolicyCost rules as code, per team

This is what a Torv PR comment looks like.

This is a real Torv output. An infrastructure change that looked routine. NAT gateway flag and a compute resize.

main.tf

resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
- count = 1
+ count = var.enable_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0
   allocation_id = aws_eip.nat.id
   subnet_id     = aws_subnet.public.id
}
 
resource "aws_instance" "app" {
- instance_type = "t3.large"
+ instance_type = "t3.medium"
}

Torv cost estimate

+$1.1k to $1.4kper month

Instance size increase

Always-on scheduling

Why this matters

Recurring monthly cost

No attached owner or budget line

Suggested fix

Drop one instance tier

Add an auto-stop schedule for non-prod

Estimates are directional. They do not affect billing. They inform decisions before billing happens.

Cost review