cloudverse
For AI Engineering

Your AI spend outran your governance. Take it back.

Attribute every dollar to a team, a feature, a use case. Route every workload to the right model. Walk into the budget conversation with numbers you can defend.

The situation

The model you picked once is now the expensive one.

You picked a model once and wired it in. There are now cheaper models that clear the same quality bar, but changing means a code change nobody has time for.Meanwhile AI-assisted coding and agents are moving your inference and GPU cost week to week, and the bill arrives with no owner attached.Agentry closes both gaps.
Model *
gpt-4-turbo
Cost per 1k tokens *
$0.030 · locked in code
Routes to
Cheaper alternative *
Same quality bar…
claude-3.5-haiku · $0.006/1k
gemini-1.5-flash · $0.004/1k
llama-3-70b · $0.003/1k
The cost of the gap

What the gap costs while you decide.

  • AI spend you can't cleanly attribute to a team, feature, or use case.
  • Unit economics borrowed from infrastructure, not sized for tokens and GPUs.
  • Inference and GPU cost that shifts every week as agents and copilots scale.
  • The "is this worth it?" question from finance you can't yet answer with confidence.
What you ship

What Agentry does for AI engineering teams.

agentry.app/routing
CostLatencyQuality
ProviderScoreRate
OpenAIbest fit
38%
$0.014/1k
Anthropic
27%
$0.018/1k
Bedrock
21%
$0.011/1k
Vertex
14%
$0.009/1k

Multi-provider routing

Every request scored across providers on cost, latency, and quality. Best-fit wins, fallback attached.

agentry.app/policy
Pre-execution policy4 rules
PII handlingEnforced
Data residencyEnforced
Provider allowlistEnforced
Budget capEnforced

Policy guardrails

Allowed providers, residency, and budget enforced before execution.

agentry.app/gpu-pools
Cost per GPU-hour, by pool
Hosted APIs$2.40/hr · 62% of load
Dedicated pools$0.85/hr · 38% of load
+24% load shifted to dedicated pools this week — saved $2,140

Right-sized GPU economics

Move workloads between hosted APIs and dedicated GPU pools as price and load change.

agentry.app/attribution
Spend attribution · live
Team45% · $28.1k
Product30% · $18.7k
Workload25% · $15.6k

Spend attribution

Cost allocated to the team, product, and workload that ran it, automatically.

agentry.app/telemetry
Tokens · last 24h2.4M
GPU utilization71% avg
per model, per runattributed

Token and GPU visibility

Token-level tracking and GPU utilization in one view, per model and per run.

agentry.app/model-registry
ModelVersionStatus
gpt-4ov2.1Primary
claude-3.5v1.4Fallback
llama-3v3.0Active

Model registry and failover

Versioned models with automatic failover when a provider degrades.

How it works

How Agentry controls
every AI request.

Read the docs
Agentry sits between your app and every AI provider. On each request it scores the routes against your team's rules and returns the best one, with a fallback and a full decision log.A gateway runs the rule you wrote. Agentry works out whether that rule is still right.
Trigger
Running
Completed
When a new deal is created

Trigger when a new deal record is created.

Running
Completed
Web Agent

Enrich the record with web research.

Running
Completed
Custom Agent

Score the lead and route to the right AE.

Running
Completed
Add to Enterprise target list

Route lead to Enterprise and draft outreach.

Running
Completed
Add to SMB target list

Route lead to SMB and draft outreach.

The numbers

What changes once Agentry is routing.

Benchmarked figures are labeled. Ranges are drawn from production workloads.

40–90% lower AI cost across production workloads
Under 15ms of routing overhead per request
96.8% lower cost and 28.5% faster than a hardcoded Claude Sonnet setup (benchmarked)
10–100x cost gap between the right model for a job and the wrong one
Outcomes

Outcomes you can take to the board.

  • Attribution. AI spend mapped to teams, features, and use cases.
  • Routing. the 10–100x waste of the wrong model for a job, gone.
  • AI-native unit economics. cost per request, per feature, per user.
  • Governance. policy, access, residency, and vendor oversight in one place.
  • Shadow AI, surfaced. the spend leaving engineering through Copilot, Cursor, and agents.
  • Credibility. a number that holds up in front of finance, the CEO, and the board.
Who this is for

The people who answer for the AI bill.

Head of AI

Every model route explained and priced, so the AI number holds up in front of the board.

Head of AI
AI leadership
Chief AI Officer

Governance and cost on one model, so growth doesn't mean losing control of spend.

Chief AI Officer
AI leadership
VP / Director of MLOps

Routing and fallback logged automatically, with no chasing why a request went where it did.

VP / Director of MLOps
AI operations
Head of Data Science / ML Engineering

Cost per request, per feature, per user, without instrumenting it by hand.

Head of Data Science / ML Engineering
AI engineering
AI Platform leads

One policy layer across every provider and GPU pool in production.

AI Platform leads
Platform engineering

AI engineering questions, answered.

What Heads of AI and MLOps leads ask first.

A gateway runs the rule you wrote. Agentry scores every route live and decides what the rule should be, then logs why.
Yes. Managed APIs and private GPU pools (vLLM/TGI, CoreWeave, Lambda, RunPod, on-prem) are all first-class routing targets.
PII is detected and handled (mask, tokenize, or block) before a request reaches any provider.
Every request is tagged to a team, feature, and tenant at routing time, so allocation needs no manual clean-up.
No. Routing and policy change at the rule layer, not in your code.
Read-only to start. Automation is opt-in, gated by approval, and fully logged.

Put a number on your AI spend you can defend.

Connect read-only in about 30 minutes. Most teams find a badly mispriced route in the first call.